The ginger tea was used by my father, therefore, I decided to make it for myself after students left. I used less than half a glass of water and half a teaspoonful of tea leaves, half a teaspoonful of ginger with about two and half teaspoonfuls of sugar which I increased to three and a half after adding about three fourths of a glass of milk. My motivation to let the tea brew qualitatively depends on whether it’s just for myself or it’s a community project. It’s a result of prolonged condemnation of living comfortably no matter how much you deserve it. Don’t be selfish. No matter how unselfish you’re you’re always selfish. No matter how much you speak you speak too much. No matter how much you eat you eat too much. Then, you learn more golden than golden principles. You may call them platinum or diamond or by any other name. There are a plethora of quotations on the importance of sacrifice, Yajna and community living to support it. Others before yourself even if they don’t reciprocate or hold similarly high standards in their behaviour.
देखिये, 13 साल की उम्र में ऊँचाई बढ़ना एक सामान्य प्रक्रिया है। आनुवंशिकता (Genetics) तो एक मुख्य कारण है, लेकिन कुछ चीज़ों पर ध्यान देकर हम इसमें मदद कर सकते हैं। जैसे:
* संतुलित आहार: सही पोषण, खासकर कैल्शियम और प्रोटीन, हड्डियों के विकास के लिए बहुत ज़रूरी है।
* नियमित व्यायाम: स्ट्रेचिंग, कूदना और दौड़ने जैसे व्यायाम ऊँचाई बढ़ाने में सहायक हो सकते हैं।
* पर्याप्त नींद: ग्रोथ हार्मोन नींद के दौरान ही सबसे ज्यादा स्रावित होता है।
That’s a snippet of a brief Live session with Gemini in which my student was trying to speak with Gemini AI, in Hindi. The eloquent and efficient communication seemed as if it was a real person well-versed in Hindi though connectivity was problematic. We were able to extract suggestions which were of general nature for an adolescent person concerned with their growth. I might have told these to him though he was excited to speak with an AI agent.
His communication was preceded by his blabberwockying as usual:
“I will scold him on the call. Is that going to create a repercussion for me?”
They went into detail about how they used an AI to threaten a friend. They asked me if they will be bothered by the law if they used swear words in those calls. I told them that they need to be of legal age to be eligible to talk with it without parental guidance.
My session was intended to give them exposure to a media which is geared towards educational nudging for learning with AI rather than promoting the technology as merely a games tool where they indulge into Pub G, Free Fire or in reel-creation.
We worked on establishing a connection. Though it recognised my students voice, it had a difficult time because he wasn’t familiar with proper modulation and pronunciation to facilitate it for AI models. In one instance the AI greeted me back with “Ola!” Though my student wasn’t using Spanish but Hindi.
It began when I told them how the Gemini text-to-speech engine was bugged. The bugs were too many to recount too. Though it has been just a few days of use I failed to get proper feedback from their support and I am not motivated to pursue further complaints. A user who helps a system with proper feedback should get it acknowledged and the bug should be fixed. Being a software professional I know it’s not rocket science. What I get instead : further bugs. The first few haven’t been fixed and new ones are introduced.
Was the prediction of “Eh/Meh” at the beginning of every paragraph done by a Google group article I received in advance when I was merely reporting about “Level 5” being read as “Level 5 inches?” I can’t be sure.
It sure made them laugh. I asked them to observe this error. They listened keenly as we were getting responses to our Maths queries. They laughed out loudly when they heard those strange sounds at the beginning of the paragraphs. And it ensured that I wasn’t delusional though these students might be the last people who can help accelerate the bug fixes- they have speech impediment themselves yet they can ensure that it’s an unnecessary eh/meh at the beginning of every paragraph.
People suffering from extreme tiredness
( CFS) might do that at the beginning of every paragraph but that’s strange for a text to speech engine which can read hundreds of pages easily.
A dog is barking outside. Bells ringing in the worship room. I visit washroom once again before this article is completed. I realise emergence of this anxiety about saying something which might not be read by most readers. What if it’s not read by anyone? At least it will survive as an archive to which you can later return to. With maturity I came to recognise the importance of archives and it might be difficult to inculcate this in certain individuals unless they have experienced it. Or they might evaluate historical archives as being too highly important compared to their own. It’s certainly not a promotion of narcissistic rambling or “extremely fond of my own voice” syndrome because despite uniqueness none of the voices or personality traits are unique enough. This doesn’t mean they don’t have a purpose at all. That’s going into nihilism and losing patience. Extreme opposite. The other one is not listening any other voice at all. Being too fond of our own voices. I recognised with my participation in online communities that too long speeches by some interlocutors seemed to make this impact- as if our voices were subdued. It can be true only for superfluous reasons for brief periods. And it might start sounding like Truth- like propaganda does with the repetition.
Gemini: Hello there! How can I help you today?
Me: Yeah, my student [ name redacted] here wants to talk to you in Hindi. Can you talk to him in Hindi?
Gemini: जी बिल्कुल! मैं [name redacted] से हिन्दी में बात कर सकता हूँ। कहिए, [] क्या पूछना चाहते हैं?
Student: आप अपनी हाइट पूछना चाहते हैं
Gemini: ज़रूर! मैं एक कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता हूँ, इसलिए मेरी कोई हाइट नहीं है। क्या आप कुछ और जानना चाहते हैं?
[ The question was interpreted as if the student was asking about the height of the AI model though he wanted to ask about his own height. Miscommunication.]
Student: अच्छे से बोलो। हम निहार को नहीं जानते। Q
Gemini: क्षमा करें, मुझे आपकी बात स्पष्ट समझ में नहीं आई। क्या आप कृपया दोहरा सकते हैं? आप किसके बारे में पूछ रहे हैं? A
[ The question was misheard again. Hence a clarification question by AI follows. ]
Me: Hello.
Gemini: हेलो! क्या आप कुछ पूछना चाहते हैं?
Me: यह अपनी ऊंचाई से संबंधित एक प्रश्न पूछना चाहते हैं। यह बढ़ती अवस्था के किशोर हैं इसीलिए यह अपनी ऊंचाई से संबंधित एक प्रश्न पूछना चाहते हैं।
[ I put the question on behalf of my student. ]
Gemini: ऊँचाई से संबंधित प्रश्न पूछने के लिए बिल्कुल ठीक है! [Name] क्या जानना चाहते हैं? क्या आप अपनी वर्तमान ऊँचाई या भविष्य के विकास के बारे में जानना चाहते हैं?
Student: बावस्की बेकार है। अच्छा बोलो। बावस्की बेकार समय।
[ Absurd recording. No sync. ]
Gemini: भविष्य के विकास के बारे में जानना चाहते हैं, यह तो बहुत अच्छा है! देखिये, ऊँचाई बढ़ना आमतौर पर एक निश्चित उम्र तक ही होता है। क्या आपकी उम्र 12 साल के आसपास है?
Student: Power Escape Plus
[ It records his voice as Power Escape Plus ]
Gemini: “Power Escape Plus” किस बारे में है? क्या आप इसके बारे में थोड़ा और बता सकते हैं?
Student: I will [ miscommunication]
Gemini: हाँ बोलिए, मैं सुन रहा हूँ।
Student: Ah. Hola, Kira. [ Mis recording]
Gemini: Hola! क्या हाल है?
Student: 12 13 12 13
Gemini: मैं ठीक हूँ, धन्यवाद! आप कैसे हैं? और 12 और 13 किस बारे में बात कर रहे हैं?
Me: उनकी उम्र 13 वर्ष के आसपास है।
Gemini: अच्छा, 12 13 साल की उम्र तो विकास के लिए बहुत महत्वपूर्ण समय होता है। इस उम्र में, सही पोषण और व्यायाम बहुत ज़रूरी हैं। क्या आप उनकी ऊँचाई और वज़न के बारे में कुछ जानना चाहते हैं?
Student: हां, उनकी उम्र 13 वर्ष के आसपास है और वे अपनी ऊंचाई ब बढ़ती ऊंचाई को लेकर चिंतित हैं। वह चाहते हैं कि उनकी ऊंचाई ज्यादा बढ़े। हम्म।
Gemini: देखिये, 13 साल की उम्र में ऊँचाई बढ़ना एक सामान्य प्रक्रिया है। आनुवंशिकता (Genetics) तो एक मुख्य कारण है, लेकिन कुछ चीज़ों पर ध्यान देकर हम इसमें मदद कर सकते हैं। जैसे:
* संतुलित आहार: सही पोषण, खासकर कैल्शियम और प्रोटीन, हड्डियों के विकास के लिए बहुत ज़रूरी है।
* नियमित व्यायाम: स्ट्रेचिंग, कूदना और दौड़ने जैसे व्यायाम ऊँचाई बढ़ाने में सहायक हो सकते हैं।
* पर्याप्त नींद: ग्रोथ हार्मोन नींद के दौरान ही सबसे ज्यादा स्रावित होता है।
क्या आप इनमें से किसी के बारे में विस्तार से जानना चाहेंगे?
Session 1:
Student: मेरी बात सुने।
Gemini: हाँ बोलिए, मैं सुन रहा हूँ। आप क्या कहना चाहते हैं?
Student: मेरा नाम मनन है। अमन
Gemini: नमस्ते मनन!
[ Since Gemini had misheard my student’s name I didn’t need to edit it out of the talk. ]
Student: नेवा लड़का है
[ Huh? ]
Gemini: नमस्ते मनन। मैं आपकी कैसे सहायता कर सकता हूँ?
Student: Hello.
Student: हेलो मेरा खराब हो गया मां बहुत मार भी मां के [ miscommunication]
Gemini: क्या खराब हो गया आपका? और आपको माँ से डाँट क्यों पड़ी? क्या कुछ गड़बड़ हो गई?
Student: मेरा नाम….
Gemini: नमस्ते नरेन्द्र! क्या आप कुछ पूछना चाहते हैं?
Student: हमें तेरा दोस्त बनना चाहते हो।
Gemini: जी हाँ, बिल्कुल! मुझे आपसे बात करके और दोस्त बनकर खुशी होगी। आप क्या पसंद करते हैं?
Student: हां मेरी हाइट कितने तक बढ़ेगी?
Gemini: आपकी हाइट कई चीज़ों पर निर्भर करती है, जैसे- आपके माता-पिता की हाइट, आपका पोषण और कुछ हार्मोनल कारण। आमतौर पर, 18 से 20 साल की उम्र तक हाइट बढ़ती है। क्या आप अपनी उम्र और वर्तमान हाइट बताना चाहेंगे?
Student: है 2012
Gemini: Session 2 as given above.
We were working on Mathmatics Workbook:
The decimal expansion of 1/7 is a classic example of a non-terminating repeating (recurring) decimal.
Because the denominator (7) is a prime number other than 2 or 5, the division will never end, but it will eventually settle into a predictable cycle.
The Expansion
The value of 1/7 is:
In mathematical notation, we write this with a bar over the repeating sequence:
Interesting Properties of 1/7
* The Six-Digit Cycle: The repeating block “142857” consists of 6 digits. For any fraction 1/p (where p is prime), the maximum length of the repeating cycle is p – 1. For 1/7, 7 – 1 = 6.
* Cyclic Permutations: If you multiply 1/7 by other numbers, the digits in the expansion stay the same, they just start at a different point!
* * * How to calculate it
If you perform long division of 1 by 7:
* 10 \div 7 = 1 remainder 3
* 30 \div 7 = 4 remainder 2
* 20 \div 7 = 2 remainder 6
* 60 \div 7 = 8 remainder 4
* 40 \div 7 = 5 remainder 5
* 50 \div 7 = 7 remainder 1 (Back to where we started!)
Once the remainder repeats (1), the entire sequence of digits starts over.
Are all Natural Numbers also Whole Numbers?
हाँ, सभी प्राकृतिक संख्याएँ (Natural Numbers) पूर्ण संख्याएँ (Whole Numbers) होती हैं।
इसे समझने का सबसे आसान तरीका यह है कि हम इन दोनों समूहों की परिभाषा देखें:
* प्राकृतिक संख्याएँ (Natural Numbers): ये गिनती वाली संख्याएँ होती हैं जो 1 से शुरू होती हैं।
* सेट: \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …\}
* पूर्ण संख्याएँ (Whole Numbers): इनमें सभी प्राकृतिक संख्याएँ शामिल होती हैं, बस 0 (शून्य) और जुड़ जाता है।
* सेट: \{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …\}
मुख्य अंतर (Key Points)
* समानता: आप देख सकते हैं कि 1, 2, 3… दोनों समूहों में मौजूद हैं।
* अंतर: केवल 0 एक ऐसी पूर्ण संख्या है जो प्राकृतिक संख्या नहीं है।
* निष्कर्ष: हर वो नंबर जिसे आप प्राकृतिक संख्या कहेंगे, वह अपने आप पूर्ण संख्या भी कहलाएगी। लेकिन इसका उल्टा (Reverse) हमेशा सच नहीं होता (क्योंकि 0 पूर्ण है पर प्राकृतिक नहीं)।
क्या आप “पूर्णांक” (Integers) और इन संख्याओं के बीच का संबंध समझना चाहेंगे?
Are all rational numbers integers?
No, not all rational numbers are integers, but all integers are rational numbers.
Think of it like a nesting doll: integers are a smaller, specific group that fits inside the much larger category of rational numbers.
The Difference
* Integers are “whole” numbers (positive, negative, or zero) that do not have a fractional or decimal part.
* Examples: -3, 0, 15, 100.
* Rational Numbers are a broader category. They include anything that can be written as a fraction \frac{p}{q}.
* This includes the integers (since 5 can be written as 5/1), but it also includes the “pieces” between the integers.
Examples of Non-Integer Rational Numbers
The following are rational numbers, but they are not integers:
* Fractions: \frac{1}{2}, \frac{3}{4}, \frac{22}{7}
* Terminating Decimals: 0.25, -1.5, 3.125
* Repeating Decimals: 0.333…, 0.1818…
Summary Table
| Number | Is it Rational? | Is it an Integer? | Why? |
|—|—|—|—|
| 5 | Yes | Yes | It’s a whole number and can be 5/1. |
| -10 | Yes | Yes | It’s a whole negative number and can be -10/1. |
| 0.5 | Yes | No | It has a decimal part; it’s between 0 and 1. |
| 3/4 | Yes | No | It represents a part of a whole, not a whole. |
Are all rational numbers also perfect numbers?
No, they are definitely not the same thing! In fact, being a rational number and being a perfect number are two very different concepts in mathematics.
The short answer is: Almost no rational numbers are perfect numbers.
1. What is a Rational Number?
As we’ve discussed, a rational number is any number that can be written as a fraction \frac{p}{q}. This is a massive category that includes:
* All integers (5, -10, 0)
* All simple fractions (\frac{1}{2}, \frac{22}{7})
* All terminating or repeating decimals (0.5, 0.\bar{3})
2. What is a Perfect Number?
A perfect number is a very rare and specific type of positive integer.
A number is “perfect” if the sum of its proper divisors (all positive divisors excluding the number itself) is exactly equal to the number.
Example: The number 6
* Divisors of 6: 1, 2, 3 (we exclude 6).
* Sum: 1 + 2 + 3 = 6.
* Therefore, 6 is a perfect number.
Example: The number 28
* Divisors of 28: 1, 2, 4, 7, 14.
* Sum: 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14 = 28.
* Therefore, 28 is a perfect number.
Why the answer is “No”
* Decimals/Fractions: A rational number like 0.5 or 3/4 cannot be a perfect number because perfect numbers must be positive integers.
* Rarity: Even among integers, perfect numbers are incredibly rare. We only know of about 51 of them in total! Most integers (like 4, 10, or 100) are not perfect.
Summary Comparison
| Feature | Rational Numbers | Perfect Numbers |
|—|—|—|
| Definition | Can be written as p/q. | Sum of proper divisors equals the number. |
| Scope | Infinite and dense. | Extremely rare positive integers. |
| Examples | 1/2, 5, 0.22, 22/7 | 6, 28, 496, 8128 |
Query: 22/7 gives 3.142… whereas π is 3.14159… why?
This is a common point of confusion! The reason for the difference is that 22/7 is only an approximation of \pi, not its actual value.
In fact, 22/7 is a rational number, while \pi is irrational. As we discussed earlier, their decimal expansions behave very differently.
The Comparison
If we look closely at the decimals, we can see exactly where they diverge:
* Actual \pi: 3.14159265… (Non-terminating, non-repeating)
* 22/7 Value: 3.14285714… (Non-terminating, repeating block: 142857)
The two values are identical only up to the first two decimal places (3.14). By the third decimal place, 22/7 (which is 3.142…) is already slightly larger than \pi (which is 3.141…).
Why do we use 22/7 then?
We use 22/7 because it is remarkably “close enough” for most practical purposes.
* Accuracy: 22/7 is accurate to within 0.04% of the true value of \pi. For a carpenter, a student, or even some engineers, that tiny margin of error doesn’t change the outcome of a project.
* Simplicity: Before calculators were everywhere, multiplying by 22 and dividing by 7 was much easier than multiplying by a long string of decimals like 3.14159.
* Archimedes’ Discovery: The ancient Greek mathematician Archimedes found that \pi sits between 223/71 and 22/7. Over time, 22/7 became the popular “shortcut” fraction.
Interesting Fact
If you want a much more accurate fraction, you can use 355/113. It matches \pi all the way to six decimal places (3.141592…).
What about the decimal expansion of irrational numbers?
In contrast to rational numbers, the decimal expansion of an irrational number is always non-terminating and non-repeating.
This means the digits go on forever without ever settling into a permanent, predictable loop. Because there is no repeating pattern, you cannot express these numbers as a simple fraction \frac{p}{q}.
Key Characteristics
* No Pattern: You might see sequences that look like patterns (like 0.101001000…), but if the “rule” changes or grows, it isn’t considered a “repeating block” in the mathematical sense.
* Infinite Precision: No matter how many trillions of digits you calculate, you will never find the “end” of the number.
* Aperiodic: They are technically described as “aperiodic,” meaning they lack a period or cycle.
Famous Examples
* Pi (\pi): Used in circles. It begins 3.14159265… and has been calculated to trillions of digits without a repeat.
* Euler’s Number (e): The base of natural logarithms. It begins 2.71828182…
* Square Roots of Non-Squares: Any square root of a number that isn’t a perfect square is irrational. For example, \sqrt{2} \approx 1.41421356…
Comparing the “Big Three” Expansions
| Number Type | Terminating? | Repeating? | Example |
|—|—|—|—|
| Rational (Terminating) | Yes | No | 1/4 = 0.25 |
| Rational (Repeating) | No | Yes | 1/3 = 0.333… |
| Irrational | No | No | \sqrt{2} = 1.414… |
Expansion of a rational number is?
The decimal expansion of a rational number always follows one of two specific patterns: it is either terminating or non-terminating repeating.
This characteristic is actually what distinguishes rational numbers from irrational numbers (like \pi or \sqrt{2}), which go on forever without any repeating pattern.
1. Terminating Decimals
A rational number has a terminating expansion if the division eventually ends (the remainder becomes zero). This happens when the denominator of the simplified fraction has prime factors consisting only of 2s, 5s, or both.
* Example: \frac{3}{4} = 0.75
* Example: \frac{1}{8} = 0.125
2. Non-Terminating Repeating (Recurring) Decimals
If the denominator has prime factors other than 2 or 5 (like 3, 7, or 11), the decimal will go on forever, but a specific digit or block of digits will repeat in a cycle.
* Example: \frac{1}{3} = 0.333… (written as 0.\bar{3})
* Example: \frac{1}{7} = 0.142857142857… (written as 0.\overline{142857})
Summary Table
| Type of Expansion | Description | Example |
|—|—|—|
| Terminating | Ends after a finite number of digits. | 1/5 = 0.2 |
| Repeating | Never ends, but digits repeat in a pattern. | 2/11 = 0.1818… |
| Non-Repeating | Never ends and has no pattern (Irrational). | \pi \approx 3.14159… |
The number of rational numbers between two rational numbers is?
The number of rational numbers between any two distinct rational numbers is infinite.
This is due to the Density Property of rational numbers. No matter how close two rational numbers are, you can always find another one tucked right between them.
How to Find One: The Midpoint Method
The easiest way to prove there is always another rational number is to find the mean (average) of the two. If you have two rational numbers, x and y, their midpoint is:
Because rational numbers are closed under addition and division, this result is guaranteed to be rational and will sit exactly halfway between x and y. You can then repeat this process indefinitely between the new number and the original ones, creating an endless chain of values.
Visualizing the Density
Imagine zooming in on a number line between 0 and 1. Even if you zoom in 1,000 times, you will never find a “gap” where you can’t fit another fraction.
Key Points to Remember
* Infinite Density: Between 0.1 and 0.11, there are infinitely many numbers (like 0.101, 0.1011, 0.10111…).
* Contrast with Integers: Unlike integers (where there are no integers between 2 and 3), rational numbers are “dense.”
* Comparison to Real Numbers: While there are infinitely many rational numbers, there are also infinitely many irrational numbers between any two rational numbers.
Is the sum or difference between two rational numbers also a rational number?
Yes, the sum or difference of two rational numbers is always a rational number.
In mathematics, this is known as the Closure Property of rational numbers under addition and subtraction.
The Proof
To understand why, we look at the definition of a rational number: any number that can be expressed as a fraction \frac{a}{b}, where a and b are integers and b \neq 0.
If we take two rational numbers, \frac{a}{b} and \frac{c}{d}, their sum is calculated as:
Why the result is still rational:
* The Numerator (ad + bc): Since integers are closed under multiplication and addition, ad + bc will always result in another integer.
* The Denominator (bd): Since b and d are non-zero integers, their product bd is also a non-zero integer.
Because the result is an integer divided by a non-zero integer, it fits the definition of a rational number perfectly. The same logic applies to subtraction, just with a minus sign.
Quick Examples
* Addition: \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} = \frac{5}{6} (Rational)
* Subtraction: 0.5 – 2 = -1.5 (Rational, as it can be written as -\frac{3}{2})
Dancing light of grace 