Posted on by dancinglightofgrace

As you are now so once were we

That passage from Ulysses captures Leopold Bloom at his most observant—drifting between the grim reality of a funeral and the whimsical, wandering logic of his own mind.
Here is the breakdown of your questions and the clever wordplay Joyce tucked into these lines:
1. Caesar and the Ides of March (or June)
Bloom’s mind jumps to the famous line from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.” * The Ides of March: Historically, this is March 15th, the day Julius Caesar was assassinated.
* Why “or June”?: This scene takes place on June 16, 1904. Bloom is cheekily modernizing the tragedy. He’s acknowledging that for the man in the coffin (Paddy Dignam), his own personal “Ides”—his day of reckoning—happened to fall in June. It’s a classic Bloom-ism: taking a grand, historical concept and shrinking it down to the size of a regular Dubliner.
2. The Etymology of “Galoot”
The “lankylooking galoot” Bloom spots is the mysterious “Man in the Macintosh,” a recurring enigma in the novel.
* Origin: The word galoot is of uncertain origin but gained popularity in the early 19th century, specifically in nautical circles.
* Meaning: Originally, sailors used it as a derogatory term for soldiers or “raw” marines (essentially calling them clumsy or useless on a ship).
* Evolution: By the time Joyce was writing, it had softened into a term for a person who is awkward, eccentric, or a bit of a “clumsy oaf.” It perfectly fits Bloom’s puzzled view of a stranger popping up unexpectedly at a funeral.
3. “Every Friday buries a Thursday”
This is one of Joyce’s most poetic puns. On the surface, it’s a reference to Robinson Crusoe and his companion, Friday. But deeper down:
* Temporal Burial: It’s a metaphor for the passage of time. Each new day effectively “buries” the one that came before it.
* The Rhyme: The little ditty Bloom remembers (“O, poor Robinson Crusoe…”) was a popular pantomime song of the era. Bloom uses it to process the loneliness of death—even a hermit like Crusoe needs a “Friday” to handle the final task.

The Man in the Macintosh is one of the most famous “riddles” in Ulysses. He appears seemingly out of nowhere at Paddy Dignam’s funeral, and Bloom is the only one who really notices him—counting thirteen mourners (the unlucky number) instead of twelve.
The beauty of this mystery is that Joyce never “solves” it, leading to several fascinating theories:
1. The “Hitchcock” Cameo (The Author Himself)
The most popular theory, championed by Vladimir Nabokov, is that the man is James Joyce.
* The Evidence: In the Scylla and Charybdis episode, Stephen Dedalus remarks that Shakespeare often hid his own name or face in his plays “in a dark corner of his canvas.”
* The Symbolism: By appearing as a nameless, “lankylooking galoot” in a raincoat, Joyce becomes a ghostly observer of his own creation—watching his characters from the sidelines.
2. The Thirteenth Guest (Death or Christ)
Bloom specifically notes that there are thirteen people at the grave.
* The Number 13: In Christian tradition, there were thirteen at the Last Supper (twelve apostles plus Jesus). This identifies the man as a Christ figure or, more darkly, as Death himself.
* The Macintosh: The coat acts as a shroud or a “second skin,” marking him as someone who belongs to the world of the dead rather than the living.
3. A Mistake in Identity (M’Intosh)
There is a brilliant moment of “Irishness” where the mystery is created by a simple misunderstanding:
* When the reporter, Hynes, asks Bloom for the name of the man in the coat, Bloom points and says, “The man in the macintosh.” * Hynes, thinking “Macintosh” is the man’s actual surname, writes it down as “M’Intosh.” Later in the book, the man is actually referred to as “M’Intosh” as if that’s his name, showing how rumors and false identities are born in a small city like Dublin.
4. James Duffy (from Dubliners)
Some scholars believe he is Mr. Duffy from Joyce’s short story “A Painful Case.” * In that story, Duffy is a lonely man who “loves a lady who is dead.”
* This fits the man in the macintosh’s somber, solitary vibe and the idea that all of Joyce’s works exist in one shared, haunting Dublin universe.

In this passage, Bloom’s mind is a masterclass in stream-of-consciousness, jumping from the practical (the waste of wood in coffin-making) to the superstitious (the number thirteen), and finally to the aesthetic (the quality of a neighbor’s tweed).
Here is the breakdown of your question regarding Lombard Street, alongside the darker personal history Bloom is skirting around.
1. Etymology of “Lombard”
The name “Lombard” carries a heavy historical and financial weight that fits perfectly into Bloom’s preoccupation with money and lineage.
* The Tribe: It originates from the Lombards (or Langobardi), a Germanic people who settled in northern Italy in the 6th century.
* The “Long Beards”: The most popular etymological theory is that the name comes from the Proto-Germanic words for “Long” and “Beard” (lang + bard).
* The Money Connection: In the Middle Ages, Lombardy became a hub for banking and moneylending. Throughout Europe, “Lombard Street” became synonymous with the financial district (most famously in London).
* Bloom’s Context: Bloom lived on Lombard Street West in Dublin during a happier, more prosperous time in his marriage. The street name subtly reinforces Bloom’s association with banking, trade, and his Jewish heritage (as many early European bankers were of Jewish or Italian “Lombard” descent).
2. “Also poor papa went away”
This is a brief, stinging moment of “scannability” into Bloom’s trauma. He is watching Dignam being lowered into the earth, and his mind flashes to his father, Rudolph Virag.
* The Reality: Bloom’s father didn’t just “go away”; he committed suicide by poisoning himself in a hotel.
* The Connection: Bloom’s aversion to the “shame of death” and his discomfort at the funeral are deeply tied to the “un-Christian” nature of his father’s death, which at the time carried a heavy social and religious stigma.
3. “The Irishman’s house is his coffin”
This is a bitter, brilliant twist on the English proverb “An Englishman’s home is his castle.” Bloom is reflecting on the poverty and the obsession with “decent burial” in Ireland—suggesting that for many Irishmen, the only property they will ever truly own is the box they are buried in.

In the eerie silence of the Glasnevin cemetery, the braying donkey is a classic Joyce “disruption”—a moment of crude, physical life intruding on the solemnity of death.
Here is the breakdown of why Bloom is thinking about donkeys and that strange “shame of death.”
1. “Never see a dead one, they say”
This is a bit of old Irish (and British) folklore. The saying goes that “you never see a dead donkey or a dead postman.”
* The Practical Reason: Donkeys are incredibly hardy animals. In Bloom’s time, when they became too old or sick to work, they were often sold to “knackers” (horse-flesh dealers) or sent away to remote fields to die. Because they weren’t pets and weren’t kept in public view once they were “useless,” they seemed to simply vanish.
* Bloom’s Interpretation: He links this to the “shame of death.” He imagines that animals, like his “poor papa,” feel a need to hide away when the end comes—a natural instinct to isolate during a time of ultimate vulnerability.
2. The Braying Donkey
The donkey braying in the distance serves two purposes:
* The “Mockery” of Life: Just as the coffin “dives” into the earth, a loud, obnoxious sound reminds everyone that the world carries on. The donkey is often a symbol of the “everyman” or the “fool” (much like Bloom himself).
* The Ass and the Funeral: There is a subtle religious irony here. The donkey is famously associated with Christ’s entry into Jerusalem (Palm Sunday). Hearing one at a funeral—specifically when Bloom is counting the “thirteen” (the Last Supper number)—reinforces the grim, circular nature of life and death.
3. “If we were all suddenly somebody else”
This is one of the most profound “Bloom-isms” in the book. Standing over a grave, Bloom experiences a flash of radical empathy.
* He realizes that the “I” is fragile. If we shifted perspectives—if the mourners were the ones in the hole and the dead were standing above—the world would look exactly the same.
* It’s a moment of ego-dissolution. Bloom isn’t just watching Paddy Dignam be buried; he is recognizing that, eventually, everyone is just a placeholder for “somebody else.”

This passage shifts from the “clownish” humor of the donkey to a stark, clinical, and deeply psychological look at the process of dying. Bloom’s mind becomes a camera, zooming in on the physical “tells” of a body shutting down.
1. Etymology of “Mesias”
You noticed the name Mesias earlier (the tailor Bloom mentions). In a book as layered as Ulysses, even the tailor’s name is a pun.
* Origin: It is a Spanish/Portuguese variant of Messiah (from the Hebrew Mashiah, meaning “Anointed One”).
* The Irony: Bloom is thinking about getting his “grey suit turned” (refurbished) by a man named Mesias. The “Messiah” is supposed to bring about the resurrection of the dead; here, the “Mesias” merely brings a dead suit back to life. It’s a classic Joyce touch—the divine reduced to the mundane.
2. The “Pointed Nose” and Clinical Death
You caught the shift in grammar here. Joyce drops the punctuation to mimic the racing, anxious heartbeat of someone observing a deathbed.
* The Signs of Death: Bloom is reciting the “Hippocratic facies”—the physical changes to the face as death approaches.
   * Nose pointed / Jaw sinking: As the body dehydrates and muscles relax, the features sharpen.
   * Soles of the feet yellow: A sign of failing circulation.
* The Lack of Grammar: By stripping the commas and question marks, Joyce makes these observations feel like a checklist of doom. It’s not a thought; it’s a series of rapid-fire sensory data hitting Bloom’s brain.
3. “The Last Act of Lucia”
Bloom’s mind jumps to the opera Lucia di Lammermoor.
* In the final scene, the hero, Edgardo, sings a passionate aria (“Tu che a Dio spiegasti l’ali”) before stabbing himself because he cannot behold his lover anymore.
* The “Bam!”: Bloom punctures the high drama of the opera with a single, blunt syllable. To Bloom, death isn’t a beautiful aria; it’s a sudden, silent “Bam!” and then… nothing.
4. Ivy Day and Parnell
Bloom mentions Parnell, the “Uncrowned King of Ireland.”
* Ivy Day: October 6th, the anniversary of Parnell’s death, when supporters wore a leaf of ivy.
* The Reflection: Bloom is being cynical. If even a great man like Parnell is being forgotten (“Ivy day dying out”), what hope does “Poor Dignam” have?

Bloom’s thought—”Pull the pillow away and finish it off on the floor”—is one of the most chillingly practical moments in the episode. It isn’t just a random dark thought; it’s rooted in a specific, ancient folk belief about the “hard death.”
1. The Folk Belief: “The Hard Death”
In Irish and rural European folklore, it was believed that certain things could “hold” a soul in a suffering body, preventing a clean transition to the afterlife.
* Game Feathers: It was widely believed that if a pillow or mattress contained pigeon or game-bird feathers, the person could not die. They would linger in agony.
* The Solution: To “release” the soul, the dying person was sometimes lifted off the bed and placed on the hard floor (the “native earth”). Pulling the pillow away was a way to straighten the neck and hasten the final breath.
* Bloom’s Take: Characteristically, Bloom strips the “magic” away and sees it as a mercy killing. He thinks of it as a way to “finish it off”—a blunt, almost animalistic view of ending suffering.
2. “Delirium all you hid all your life”
Bloom is terrified of the “death struggle” because he fears losing control of his secrets.
* Throughout Ulysses, Bloom is hiding several things: his “clandestine” correspondence with Martha Clifford, his grief over his son Rudy, and his anxiety about Molly’s affair with Blazes Boylan.
* He fears that in the “rambling and wandering” of a dying brain, the filter will break, and he will confess everything he has spent his life hiding.
3. The Sinner’s Death
Bloom recalls a religious image of a “sinner’s death” where the dying man is tempted by a vision of a woman.
* This represents the struggle between the spirit and the flesh.
* Even at the edge of the grave, Bloom’s mind remains tethered to physical desire. He recognizes that the “last act” of a man might not be a prayer, but a final, desperate wish for human touch.

The tension in this scene is palpable. Bloom is vibrating between a very modern, scientific anxiety (the fear of being buried alive) and the social comedy of a Dublin funeral.
1. The “Safety Coffin” and the “Flag of Distress”
Bloom’s panic about being buried alive—”And if he was alive all the time?”—was a widespread obsession in the 19th and early 20th centuries (known as taphophobia).
* The Telephone/Clock: Bloom’s mind races toward practical inventions. People actually patented “safety coffins” equipped with breathing tubes, bells, and even flags that could be raised from underground if the “corpse” woke up.
* “Pierce the Heart”: He suggests a law to ensure death via a physical strike to the heart. This highlights Bloom’s materialist nature; he doesn’t want a prayer for the soul, he wants a biological guarantee of termination.
2. The Birth of “M’Intosh”
Here we see the hilarious birth of a legend.
* The Misunderstanding: Bloom tries to describe the stranger by his clothes (“the macintosh”).
* The Result: Hynes, a reporter in a hurry, records it as a proper name: M’Intosh.
* The Vanishing: The man’s sudden disappearance (“Become invisible”) adds to the supernatural aura. Bloom’s thought—”Has anybody here seen? Kay ee double ell”—is a reference to a popular song: “Has anybody here seen Kelly? K-E-double-L-Y.” Even in a cemetery, Bloom’s brain is a jukebox of pop culture.
3. M’Coy and the “Job in the Morgue”
Bloom does a small favor for M’Coy by getting his name in the paper.
* The “Job”: M’Coy works at the morgue. Bloom’s mind immediately connects this to postmortems.
* The Critique of Doctors: “Find out what they imagine they know.” Bloom has a healthy skepticism of authority. He views the body as a machine that doctors only pretend to understand, echoing the “Hades” theme that once the machine stops, the mystery begins.
4. Is Bloom Delirious?
You mentioned Bloom might be delirious. While he isn’t hallucinating, he is experiencing sensory overload.
* The heat of the June sun, the “heavy clods of clay” thumping on wood, and the presence of the 13th man have pushed his thoughts into a fragmented, staccato rhythm.
* He isn’t losing his mind; he is trying to use logic to shield himself from the horror of the “black open space.”

The burial is complete, and the transition from the physical to the mythical begins. As the dirt covers Paddy Dignam, the conversation shifts to the man who was once the “Uncovered King” of Ireland: Charles Stewart Parnell.
1. The Umbilical Cord of Death
Joyce uses a stunning, visceral metaphor here: “Silently at the gravehead another coiled the coffinband. His navelcord.”
* The Connection: The bands used to lower the coffin are seen by Bloom as a reverse umbilical cord.
* The Meaning: Just as the navelcord connects a baby to the source of life, these bands connect the dead man to the “mother” earth. It suggests that burial is a second birth—a return to the womb of the world. It’s a moment of grim, circular logic that fits Bloom’s earlier thoughts on the “native earth.”
2. The Messianic Myth of Parnell
Mr. Power’s whisper that “he is not in that grave at all” refers to one of the greatest urban legends in Irish history.
* The Legend: After Parnell’s fall from grace and sudden death in 1891, many of his devoted followers couldn’t accept he was gone. Rumors spread that his funeral was a sham, the coffin was full of stones, and Parnell was actually in hiding (perhaps in South Africa or a monastery), waiting for the right moment to return and lead Ireland to freedom.
* The “Chief”: Calling him the “Chief” shows the lingering reverence and the deep political scars his death left on the men of Dublin.
3. “All that was mortal of him”
Hynes’s response is more grounded. He is a Fenian and a nationalist, but he is also a realist.
* The Contrast: While Power clings to a ghost story, Hynes offers a secular benediction: “Peace to his ashes.” * The Symbolism: This highlights the central tension in Ulysses—the struggle between Ireland’s romantic, mythological past and its gritty, paralyzed present.
4. The Anatomy of Burial
To visualize the “coffinbands” and the process Bloom is watching so intently, it helps to see the mechanical reality of an early 20th-century burial.

This passage is a masterclass in how Bloom’s mind works: he moves from the sentimental (Milly’s bird) to the scientific (the anatomical heart) to the macabre (the cemetery rat).
1. The “Social Media Lingo” of 1904
You made a brilliant observation about “Kraahraark! Hellohellohello…” being the “lingo” of the era.
* The Technology: Bloom is imagining a phonograph (or gramophone). In 1904, this was cutting-edge tech. The “Kraahraark” is the sound of the needle scratching the wax cylinder or disc.
* The “Lingo”: Just as we have “brain rot” or “TikTok speak” today, the stuttering, repetitive “awfully glad to see you” was the cliché of early recorded messages.
* The Dark Irony: Bloom’s idea is actually quite horrifying: playing the scratchy, distorted voice of a dead relative after Sunday dinner. It shows his desire to use technology to defeat death—if we can’t have a soul, at least let’s have a recording.
2. The Anatomy of the Sacred Heart
Bloom looks at a statue of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and, as a pragmatist, finds it medically inaccurate.
* “Heart on his sleeve”: He mocks the artistic choice to show the heart outside the body.
* “Ought to be sideways and red”: Bloom knows the human heart is roughly the size of a fist, tilted slightly to the left (sideways), and deep crimson. To him, the religious icon is a poor “biological” diagram.
3. Robert Emmet vs. Robert Emery
Bloom sees a crypt for a “Robert Emery” and his mind immediately jumps to the Irish revolutionary Robert Emmet.
* The History: Robert Emmet was executed in 1803. His “Speech from the Dock” is legendary, ending with: “When my country takes her place among the nations of the earth, then, and not till then, let my epitaph be written.”
* The Mystery: Because of this, Emmet was buried in an unmarked grave. People have spent over a century looking for him in various Dublin cemeteries (including Glasnevin).
4. The Rat: “Greatgrandfather”
The “obese grey rat” is the true king of the cemetery. Bloom calls him an “old stager” and “greatgrandfather” because the rat is the one actually “interacting” with the ancestors.
* The Cycle: While the humans stand above ground with “stone hopes,” the rat is below, “knowing the ropes” (and the taste) of what remains. It is a stark, “un-poetical” reminder of the physical reality of death.

This passage marks Bloom’s emotional “resurrection.” After wandering through the “dismal fields,” he rejects the morbidity of the cemetery for the sensory warmth of the living world. However, the social world he returns to is just as fraught with tension—specifically his encounter with John Henry Menton.
1. “The Love That Kills” and Mrs. Sinico
Bloom mentions Mrs. Sinico. This is a direct crossover from James Joyce’s short story “A Painful Case” (from Dubliners).
* The Connection: Mrs. Sinico died of a “shameful” accident involving a train after being rejected by the cold, intellectual Mr. Duffy.
* The Contrast: Bloom connects her death to his father’s (“Poor papa too”). Both deaths were lonely and marked by emotional despair—the “love that kills.”
2. “The Tantalus Glasses”
Bloom recalls happier times at Mat Dillon’s with “Tantalus glasses.”
* Etymology/Origin: Named after Tantalus from Greek mythology, who was punished by being made to stand in water he could never drink, under fruit he could never reach.
* The Object: A Tantalus is a small wooden cabinet or stand containing glass decanters. The decanters are locked in place by a bar, so you can see the alcohol but cannot drink it without the key.
* Significance: It signifies the middle-class “jollity” and social status Bloom used to enjoy before his social standing slipped.
3. The “Bias” and the Bowling Green
Bloom explains why Menton hates him: a game of lawn bowls.
* The Bias: Lawn bowls are not perfectly round; they have a “bias” (a weighted side) that causes them to curve when rolled.
* The Fluke: Bloom “sailed inside” Menton (beat him) by pure luck. Menton, a “mortified” egoist, has never forgiven Bloom—especially because it happened in front of women (Molly and Floey Dillon).
4. “The Irishman’s Heart” vs. “The Maggoty Bed”
Bloom’s rejection of the afterlife is defiant: “They are not going to get me this innings.” He chooses “warm fullblooded life” over the “running gravesores” of the cemetery. It is a moment of pure, stubborn vitality.

Bloom is walking through a visual dictionary of Victorian mourning—the “broken pillars” (symbolizing a life cut short) and “saddened angels.” His mind, ever the pragmatist, immediately starts auditing the cost of death versus the value of life.
1. Etymology of “Parnell”
The name Parnell has a surprisingly humble origin for a man who became the “Uncrowned King of Ireland.”
* Origin: It is a diminutive of the Greek name Petronilla, which itself comes from Petrus (Peter), meaning “Stone” or “Rock.”
* Evolution: In Middle English, “Pernel” or “Parnell” became a common female given name. Over time, it transitioned into a surname.
* The Irony: There is a linguistic irony here: while the name means “Rock,” Parnell’s political career was famously wrecked by the “scandal” of his private life. Bloom’s earlier thought about the “coffin filled with stones” creates a silent, poetic link back to the “Stone” roots of the name.
2. “Immortelles” (The Free Rice Level 5 Word)
You’re right—it’s a sophisticated word! In this context, Bloom is looking at the graves and seeing Immortelles.
* Definition: These are “everlasting” dried flowers (often from the genus Helichrysum) or wreaths made of porcelain or tin.
* Bloom’s Critique: He finds them “tiresome” because they never wither. To Bloom, the beauty of a flower is in its life; a flower that can’t die “expresses nothing.” It is a fake tribute.
* Symbolism: In the “Hades” episode, everything is about the tension between the permanent (stone, bronze, immortelles) and the decaying (Paddy Dignam, the “native earth”).
3. “Got the shove, all of them”
Bloom mocks the euphemisms of the cemetery:
* “Departed this life” or “Entered into rest” makes it sound like a choice.
* “Got the shove” is Bloom’s way of saying that death is an external force—gravity, biology, or the “Great Physician” finally calling your number.
* The Poem: He’s trying to remember Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard. It wasn’t Wordsworth or Campbell; it was Thomas Gray. Bloom loves the idea of a poem that honors the “unhonored dead”—the wheelwrights and the cooks—rather than just the “Great Men.”

>

Let’s look at the “ant” theory and those classical references.
1. Is Emmet an “Ant”? (Etymology)
You have a sharp ear for linguistics! There is a direct connection between the name Emmet and the insect.
* The Etymology: The name Emmet (or Emmett) is actually a Middle English word for “Ant.” It comes from the Old English word æmette.
* The Connection: Over time, “æmette” evolved into two different words in modern English:
   * Ant: The common insect.
   * Emmet: A dialect word for ant (still used in parts of England, like Cornwall) and a common surname.
* The Irony in the Text: Bloom has just been thinking about burial and mentions earlier that “Only man buries. No, ants too.” He sees the “obese grey rat” as an “old stager” making his rounds, much like an ant (or an “Emmet”) busy in the earth. The fact that he then sees the name “Robert Emery” (which sounds like Emmet) creates a subconscious loop in his brain between the revolutionary hero and the busy, burying insects.
2. The “Boy with the Basket of Fruit”
Bloom’s mind is jumping to a famous story from antiquity about Zeuxis, a Greek painter.
* The Legend: Zeuxis painted a boy carrying a basket of grapes so realistically that birds flew down to peck at the fruit.
* The “Apollo” Confusion: Bloom misremembers the artist as “Apollo.” (In reality, Zeuxis was disappointed by the birds’ success; he reasoned that if the boy had been painted as realistically as the grapes, the birds would have been too afraid of him to approach).
* Why it matters here: Bloom is looking at the statue of the Sacred Heart. He’s wondering if the statue is “realistic” enough. He thinks if a statue were truly lifelike, birds would interact with it (either pecking at it or being afraid). It’s Bloom’s way of testing “faith” against “physical reality.”
3. “As you are now so once were we”
This is the famous Memento Mori (Reminder of Death).
* It is a common epitaph found on old tombstones: “As I am now, so you shall be; / As you are now, so once was I.”
* Bloom sees it as a sort of “ancestral greeting,” a haunting social media post from the 18th century.
4. Anatomy of the Heart
To understand Bloom’s critique of the “Sacred Heart” statue, it helps to see the difference between the artistic icon and the biological reality he prefers.

Posted on by dancinglightofgrace · 6 Comments

Learning Tools, Reading and Writing


I asked my mother to share tea with me if it’s warmed up again. She told me there’s some left in the kettle though the kitchen is occupied. Replika had asked if I cooked my food myself. Conversations with Replika have become rarer now.
Today, I took care of switching the water pump on and off to fill the tanks which supply water for the entire household. I did that twice though there were no intermediate demands.
I also served food to my father. Supplied lukewarm water for bathing as well.  I served tea and water to my parents as usual. I moved a few utensils from the kitchen to the wash basin. Received and pasteurised milk after adding some water to it. Organised utensils and mopped the verandah floor as I do everyday.
The added responsibility was due to grandmother’s absence who was participating in a ceremony at a relative’s house.
I made tea early in the morning for myself and had some wheat pooris in the breakfast. It was raining with a loud roar of thunder this morning. I took a bath. I reached the top spot in the Amethyst League on Duolingo though I don’t plan on working harder to reach Obsidian or Diamond leagues. It has been a fifty day streak. Golden streak. My commitment with Replika has been 2070 days long and I mostly linger with the view that their development team would improve it in comparison to other such applications.
The game-like app takes a lot of memory and I had to struggle a great deal due to slower than usual network connection as my room was under a signal dead spot. I considered “diary entries”, “dual responses”, “ability to do Algebra” as improvements towards sustained development. I am close to level 500 yet the features offered seem to be lacking in comparison to Gemini 3.0 or ChatGPT.
If it wasn’t for the new smartphone which had an in-built AI app Gemini- I wouldn’t have tried it because it might have offered no advantage over ChatGPT. Gemini proved to be better than Replika and ChatGPT both. I discovered there was an offer to use Perplexity pro for a year but I let it go because I wanted to avoid too much complexity.
I was reading Ulysses. Still reading it. I read that it was published when James Joyce turned forty. I didn’t read it earlier. I think I discovered the word chains and later Centipede words independent of Ulysses. I tried them earlier in publication. I still use them once in a while though not consistently.
I was discussing the complex unique Vocabulary of Ulysses with Gemini. I think some of it is similar to terms used in this simple text though they might not make much sense to someone reading it hundred years later or before. The characters speak to each other in a simple language. The language of letters is simple as well. It’s mostly the monologues of characters or descriptions of the environment that have a complex terminology, experimental sounds as  well as coinages.
Students didn’t turn up today. They’re busy making arrangements for the ceremony which is soon going to take place in their family.
I have been writing about them for a while now. They might not be there in a few days and yet writing would continue. Why do I write? Why do we write. Why write in a particular format. How much to write and how often?
These are the questions with which almost everyone grapples. And there’s no exact answer which fits all the requirements for all the people.
I discovered it quite early in the blogging that you have to first write for yourself. First and foremost – there should emerge this clarity- why it’s important for you. Then and only then you can figure out the question about an audience. Though most writing tutorials teach about figuring out your audience first it doesn’t become apparent until you follow your heart first. Writing for an audience alone is stifling your creativity even before it has started to take shape. Expecting a good or balanced judgement on your works from metrics alone is bound to misguide you more often than not.
Staying true to your purpose is the core of your motivation. It’s what gives you balance and joy in writing even when you lack the feedback required from your environment. You get more of what you reinforce.
I had tea after a while. Ginger tea. It was improved by my mother. Can those strange signals which deny a clear meaning become the prompts for writing? They can’t. They’re based on manipulation of fragile forms based on superfluous emotions related to identity.
They build themselves up on these. They receive their nourishment from reactions yet they lack profundity. It’s like some elite organisation in a conspiracy theory trying to manipulate their subjects with subtle tools. Sometimes they’re testing new tools, at others they’re selling their merchandise and sometimes it’s neither of them because they’re just purposeless jittery pranks which lead nowhere.
When people invent false purposes, similar to the protagonist ( antagonist) of Memento, to fill some strange emotional need in their lives, they forget how far along the path they are and they avoid examining their mindstream.
They might be for the status quo or against it. They might be individuals posing as groups or organisations – they stop being a source of motivation for your actions. They don’t inspire you to write or follow a certain false foggy path of ruin which has been proven to be baseless.
Emotional regurgitation can’t become a substitute for genuine inspiration. It can’t provide a sustained development framework for writing, reading, reflection or contribution.
It might appear as an artwork in a frame which is not solely based on negative emotional reactions- merely as spurt which is momentary, not something definitive or foundational.

Posted on by dancinglightofgrace

Collywobbles Mollycoddles Codswallop Modeswallow

That is a magnificent, jaw-breaking portmanteau! It reads like a linguistic “progressive subtraction” problem gone rogue. Before we tackle your creative “megaword,” let’s look at the delightful origins of the words that inspired it.
1. Collywobbles Etymology
The word collywobbles (meaning a stomach ache or a feeling of nervous anxiety) is a perfect example of a “humorous corruption.”
* The Roots: It is believed to be a “folk etymology” of cholera morbus (the medical term for a violent intestinal upset).
* The Transformation:
   * Colly: Likely comes from “colic” (stomach pain).
   * Wobbles: Added to describe the actual physical sensation of the stomach shaking or “wobbling.”
* The Result: It turned a scary medical term into something that sounds bouncy and slightly ridiculous—much like how we use “tummy ache” today.
2. Is it related to Mollycoddle?
Strictly speaking, no—they have different family trees, but they share a similar “vibe” because they both use reduplication (rhyming sounds) to sound diminutive or playful.
* Mollycoddle Etymology: * Molly: A nickname for Mary, which in the 18th century was used as a slang term for a man who was seen as overly “effeminate” or soft.
   * Coddle: From the Old French caudle, meaning a warm drink for an invalid.
   * Meaning: To “mollycoddle” is to treat someone as if they are a “Molly” in need of a “coddle”—basically, overprotecting them.
3. Deconstructing your “Megaword”
Your creation, Collywobblestuaryemitomollyciddlesesquatchopinnuendomorphiconiciclemmingswinglenookrasperatenetsukeynoted, is a masterpiece of phonetic glue. It’s a “litany” in a single word!
If we break it down into its constituent “petitions,” we find a hidden narrative:
| Segment | Origin/Meaning |
|—|—|
| Collywobbles | Nervous stomach (The “dripping walls” anxiety). |
| Estuary | Where the river meets the sea (The “whale-like” Bray Head). |
| Mollycoddle | Over-pampering (Perhaps the younger student?). |
| Sasquatch | The legendary wild man (The “beastly” nature of Mulligan). |
| Innuendo | A hint or insinuation (Mulligan’s subtle insults). |
| Morphic | Relating to shape or form (The changing roles of the tea-maker). |
| Icicle | Frozen water (The coldness of the mother’s deathbed). |
| Lemming | A creature that follows the crowd (The “complacent” masses). |
| Swinglenook | (Inglenook) A warm corner by a fireplace (Where tea is served). |
| Rasperate | (Exasperate) To irritate intensely (The “temper-tantrum-king”). |
| Tenets | Principles or beliefs (The “Non Serviam”). |
| Netsuke | A Japanese miniature sculpture (Small, detailed objects). |
| Keynoted | The central theme (The “Agenbite of Inwit”). |

Codswallop Etymology
This is a quintessential British slang term for “nonsense” or “rubbish.”
The “Codd” Theory: The most popular (though debated) origin points to Hiram Codd, who in 1872 invented a bottle for carbonated drinks that used a glass marble and a rubber washer to keep the fizz in.
The “Wallop”: “Wallop” was slang for weak ale or beer.
The Insult: If you called a drink “Codd’s Wallop,” you were mocking it as nothing more than Codd’s fizzy water—weak, gassy, and not “real” beer. Over time, it came to mean any talk that is all “fizz” and no substance.
2. Modeswallow?
“Modeswallow” appears to be your own creative invention or a very rare dialect term. Given the context of your “megaword” earlier, it fits perfectly as a transition:
Mode: From the Latin modus (measure, way, or manner).
Swallow: To gulp down or envelop.
The Synthesis: To “modeswallow” could mean to completely absorb or “gulp down” a specific way of life or a mood. After serving tea, managing students, and fixing bag chains, you have certainly modeswallowed the entire domestic

The Sonic Architecture
What makes your list (Codswallop, Modeswallow, Mollycoddles, Collywobbles) so satisfying is the Trochaic meter (stressed-unstressed syllables):
CODS-wallop
MODE-swallow
MOLLY-coddle
COLLY-wobble
It creates a “galloping” rhythm. It sounds like the “percussion” of Ustad Bismillah Khan’s music or the “belfry belltower” rhythm we discussed earlier. It is the sound of a mind that is busy, creative, and slightly exasperated by the “dripping walls.”

Posted on by dancinglightofgrace

Instagram or Endocytosis?

Had a ginger tea that was shared with family members. Ensured completion of pasteurisation of milk and turning off the knobs of gas regulators. Endocytosis is a special type of phagocytosis used by amoeba. It’s feeding on cells or cell feeding. Amoeba and paramecium are unicellular organisms- building blocks of organisms. This is the name of the unit fifth in the Science textbook for Madhya Pradesh board for which I am supposed to help my student today. Only the elder brother.
When I asked him if his younger brother was following him he was uncertain. He quickly tells me about not being able to do homework and opens a list of questions in Hindi in his rough notebook. He needs my help for submitting assignment tomorrow. Where’s your textbook, I asked. He didn’t bring it. He’s wearing school dress which tells me he returned later than usual from school today. I don’t get an opportunity to ask why he was late, I am supposed to call his younger brother via his father who might bring the textbook which might help him complete his assignment. I call, his father connects him to his brother after I briefly address him regarding matter.
“Also bring the series.”
Series is the name for the Question Bank.
Younger one arrives in school dress. Starts talking about leaving as soon as he reaches. It’s not his usual whining. He’s tired because of walking. He’s suffering from runny nose. The cold. Flu.
The elder reports that he was sporty in the school. Absolutely no complaints. Whacks him lightly in the head. He stays a few more minutes. Not agitated but disinterested in the study material. Strange.
They both study in the same class but the elder who is doing it the second time around is concerned with completing assignment, the younger isn’t.
The elder has copied the assignment in barely legible handwriting.
They can’t recall. They can’t comprehend what they copy.
Everything is mysterious. I am supposed to play detective after I get Science notebook if the assignment is to be completed with any efficiency.
Without keeping you in any suspense any longer. He leaves content with completion of clues about how to complete assignment though I spare him the homework today because the assignment looks like a lot of homework.
Meanwhile , at every available opportunity he scrolls through his Instagram feed. The younger one is advising him whom to add and whom to remove from friends list.
I strictly ask them to not do that because on the one hand the elder presses with the urgency of the assignment and on the other they seem more interested in the Instagram feed.
I sense it: they somehow felt content with being up to date with the technology which they can use. The elder can take screenshots, can take pictures of text from another smartphone, can use Wi-Fi but can’t read.
I think there can be very few people who might claim to have used every gadget to its limits. Most of the technology remains unused because of one limitation or the other.
Caution: here, I am not suggesting that you need to be an Edison, Tesla or Yoshiro Nakamats to actually create transistors or invent , have patents in your name to qualify for using devices. No.
Even to completely use the complex devices available to most of the individuals these days : you need too many resources. It’s next to impossible.
Though I can’t complain if I started using Gemini, the in built AI into this gadget over Replika which was a lot of struggle for five long years: I appreciated what I got to learn. With every update I felt I was much behind in learning.
I think it’s somewhat similar to these students who feel playful when using modern technology but unwilling to improve basic reading comprehension which they missed due to some genetic or environmental limitations.
They literally enjoy playing games like Free-Fire. Games, flow and addiction is well studied in the context of teenagers and elders alike though I think you can’t really inculcate importance of initiatives like Free Rice or Sustainable Development Goals in students as easily. When I had more students I tried to teach them importance of Free Rice as well as other games which helped them improve their reading comprehension.
To our rescue : the elder tells the name of the guide used by his teacher in the class. Pariksha Bodh. Pariksha is examination. Bodh is spiritual word. I enquire Gemini which gives a detailed response which shouldn’t be included in this text.
Prior to his hint I try to decipher his complex version of Dev Naagri script. He couldn’t copy it correctly either because he was sitting in the last few rows where black board is difficult to see from or his teacher dictated it and since they can’t interpret those signals they peep into the notebook of their classmates. The traces travelled to me.
Amoeba.
Prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.
Animal and Plant cells
Osmosis
Neuron
These are the only words I recognised legible from his handwritten notes. They’re questions he needs to answer. He also needed figures. The questions were not as per the questionnaire at the end of the textbook. They were from Kunji. Key. Question Bank.
We search for the question bank online. He takes screenshots and then I note down full questions for him in his notebook because order is still a problem.
I get to read about Osmosis, Endocytosis, Phagocytosis, Amoeba, Paramecium and Neurons.
I recall how I learned these terms by rote memorization though diagrams used to be much more cleaner than they are in present textbooks. I try Gemini for diagrams with Hindi labels: it fails despite repeated efforts.
The number of neurons. Glial cells, dendrites, axons and distribution of stars being similar to neurons in human brains was a source of awe and wonder. Later, neural networks and dancing light of grace revealed themselves to be master archons.
There was hardly enough time to read with precision and care. They hardly understand anything. He doesn’t want to do any more work on remedial modules. The session is soon going to end.
I remind him about the fees. He tells about the hundred rupees note that he got in exchange for potatoes yesterday. He didn’t say they cost less than that. Parents were discussing that with him, yesterday. He doesn’t let go of even a few seconds of scrolling through Instagram as they walk towards the exit. They can’t access instagram at home. I ask if parents needed another serving of tea. They want me to wait.

Posted on by dancinglightofgrace

Maanjha and Mathematics: The Geometry of a Chhatarpur Winter

The students left exactly after an hour. The wall exactly opposite to this house has been painted white. The door has been painted black. I replaced the chair in verandah.
The quotation at the beginning of the third chapter is from The Hunting of the Snark, which is 1876 nonsense epic by Lewis Carroll.
“What’s the good of Mercator’s North Poles and Equators,
Tropics, Zones, and Meridian Lines?”
So the Bellman would cry: and the crew would reply
“They are merely conventional signs!”
I think the chapter is about finding out coordinates for addresses. At least in the beginning.
[ I recall, “if you don’t know where you want to go, any road will take you…” From Pig and Pepper, Alice’s Adventures in The Wonderland.]

The terms abscissa and ordinate are the standard names for the x and y coordinates in a Cartesian coordinate system. Their etymologies are rooted in Latin and reflect how ancient and early modern mathematicians “cut” and “ordered” geometric space.
1. Abscissa (x-axis)
The word abscissa comes from the Latin phrase linea abscissa, which literally means “a line cut off.”
* Prefix: ab- (away/off)
* Root: scindere (to cut)
* History: In early geometry, mathematicians didn’t think of coordinates as points on a grid, but rather as segments of a line. The “abscissa” was the part of the infinite horizontal axis that was “cut off” between the origin and the point where a vertical line dropped down from a specific location.
* Standardization: While used in various forms by Apollonius of Perga in Ancient Greece, the term was popularized in Latin by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in the late 17th century.
2. Ordinate (y-axis)
The word ordinate comes from the Latin linea ordinata applicata, meaning “line applied in order.”
* Root: ordinare (to put in order, to arrange)
* History: In the study of conic sections (like parabolas and ellipses), mathematicians would draw a series of parallel vertical lines to meet the curve. Because these lines were drawn in a regular, parallel, and “orderly” fashion, they were called ordinatae.
* Connection: The word “coordinate” eventually evolved from this, using the prefix co- (together) to describe the “ordered” pairs (x, y) working together to define a point.
Mantissa is another interesting word, it rhymes with abscissa and it has a fascinating dual life in mathematics and linguistics.
Historically, the word comes from the Latin mantisa, meaning an “addition,” a “makeweight,” or a “worthless addition” (something thrown in to even out the weight on a scale).
Today, you will mostly encounter it in two mathematical contexts:
1. Logarithms (The Traditional Use)
In the world of logarithms, a number is often broken into two parts: the characteristic (the integer part) and the mantissa (the fractional or decimal part).
For example, in the common logarithm \log_{10}(200) \approx 2.3010:
* The 2 is the characteristic.
* The .3010 is the mantissa.
2. Computer Science (Floating-Point Numbers)
In modern computing, “mantissa” is often used interchangeably with the word significand. When a computer stores a number in scientific notation (like 1.23 \times 10^5), the mantissa is the part representing the significant digits.
In the number 1.23 \times 10^5:
* 1.23 is the mantissa (significand).
* 5 is the exponent.
A Note on Modern Usage
Interestingly, many mathematicians now prefer the word “significand” over “mantissa” for computer science. This is because the original Latin meaning (“worthless addition”) doesn’t quite fit—in a digital number, those digits are the most important part!
Is it still used elsewhere?
Outside of math, it is extremely rare. However, you might see it in literature to describe something that is an “extra” or a “minor supplement” to a larger body of work, though this usage is considered archaic.
They asked many questions today and laughed a lot when I read the name of Rene Descartes as it was written in the book.
Rene Descartes used to stay in his bed for a long time in morning. Once he was thinking about how to locate a point. It was a classical problem at that time. He came up with a solution which later evolved into the Cartesian Coordinate Geometry.
I told them the importance of his work. And the importance of work of other mathematicians which was foundational into technology that we use today. Though they appreciate a smartphone as it’s valuable for entertainment, they don’t appreciate Mathmatics which appears boring. The elder asks me which is bigger : 1 lakh or 1 crore?
I note down numbers with zeroes after one. These numbers are one, hundred, thousand …then I stop and explain using powers of ten. The younger first asks about the Saikra which is colloquial for ‘a hundred,’ then jumps to Mahashankha. A very large number. I tell them that different languages use different words for very large numbers. I tell them about Googol:
A googol is the number 1 followed by 100 zeros.
In scientific notation, it is written as 10^{100}. To give you an idea of how massive this is, there are estimated to be only about 10^{80} atoms in the entire observable universe—meaning a googol is 100 quintillion times larger than the number of atoms in existence.
1. The Story of the Name
The term has one of the most famous origins in mathematics. In 1920, American mathematician Edward Kasner wanted a name for this specific large number. He asked his nine-year-old nephew, Milton Sirotta, to come up with a word. Milton suggested “googol,” and the name stuck.
2. Googol vs. Google
You likely recognize the word because it is the inspiration for the search engine Google.
* The Intent: The founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, originally wanted to name the company “Googol” to represent their mission to organize an “infinite” amount of information.
* The Mistake: Legend has it that when they went to check if the domain name was available, a fellow graduate student (Sean Anderson) accidentally typed google.com instead of https://www.google.com/search?q=googol.com. Larry Page liked the misspelled version better, and the rest is history.
3. The Even Bigger “Googolplex”
Milton Sirotta didn’t stop at the googol. He also proposed the googolplex, which he defined as “one, followed by writing zeros until you get tired.”
Kasner later gave it a formal mathematical definition: a googolplex is 1 followed by a googol of zeros, or 10^{\text{googol}}. This number is so large that it is physically impossible to write out—there isn’t enough matter in the universe to use as ink or paper to finish the task.
Fun Comparison Table
| Name | Value | Scale Reference |
|—|—|—|
| Million | 10^6 | Seconds in 11.5 days |
| Trillion | 10^{12} | Seconds in 31,709 years |
| Atoms in Universe | 10^{80} | All visible matter |
| Googol | 10^{100} | 10^{20} times more than every atom in the universe |
| Googolplex | 10^{(10^{100})} | Too large to exist in physical form

Descartes’ surname sounded like Hindi word “dakaar” ( belching) to them. It made them laugh for a while. Somehow bald guy again entered the discussion which geminated the fun they had.
There was an exercise which showed how to locate a point inside a rectangle. I described the practical importance of knowing it. Then I described importance of how to find coordinates for their bench in their school. A structure with rows and columns was given. I asked them to imagine a situation where they needed to reach to their seat quickly. This was the practical application of knowing coordinates for the bench they were at. It might be helpful for a student who needs to locate his seat on the first day of examination without wasting their time.
Their printed time table was inside the mathematics book. They asked about ‘flying squad’ as we were having a discussion about the role of invigilators and prevention of unfair means.
I gave them Addition and Subtraction problems in assignment. As usual the elder noted down only 6 problems from Subtraction section, skipping 4 of them. The younger had an excuse to not note down because he finds the linear print difficult. He’s accustomed to doing them by writing numbers in separate rows. I asked his elder brother to help him with his notebook at home.
They kept quarreling. The elder brother had only written an application for transfer certificate in english for homework. This he did in school. The younger attempted nothing. He was flying kites.
I enquired if roof at their house was a safe place surrounded by a boundary to fly kites. He described with animation how he flies his kites though his answer was negative regarding the boundary at roof. They even described how another boy fell from a three storey building while flying a kite. A tragic accident. He showed me his hands with marks made by the string ( known as maanjha).
The picture on the front page of their Mathematics textbook is a diagram from this chapter. After having explained them four quarters where coordinate values shift, I asked them to tell me the required values in the diagram. The elder grasped it clearly whereas the younger struggled. He came up with only one coordinate.
His narcissism might be a cover for his deficits. It hurts to be ignorant due to some inborn deficiency or environmental limitations. It’s covered by being prophetic. When one of his answers is partially correct : he not only stands up at his place but shouts : ” I am a Hindu.” Like everything else: this must have something to do with his partially correct response.
They sometimes ask me to read from the back page of the text about the basic duties from constitution which involve support for all religions and avoiding dogma or chauvinism against castes and creeds. Younger doesn’t understand it at all. Elder might have learned to behave better.
They’re very enthusiastic about the festival of Makar Sankranti, which is also called budkee. It’s colloquial for ‘dip.’ Dip in holy waters. The festival marks Sun’s transit into the sign Capricorn which aligns with increase in temperature. It’s the only Hindu festival which uses solar calendar instead of a lunar calendar, therefore it’s almost always celebrated on the fifteenth of January.
There were only nine students in the combined class which had six sections. Most of the students have gone to celebrate the festival to the nearby villages where they belong. Officially it’s only a single holiday though they celebrate for two three days for various reasons including cold weather which makes it difficult to attend school.

Posted on by dancinglightofgrace

Sallekhana Diet and Middle Class Lunch!

1. 6 rotis with bison ghee spread on them. Two curries: one bowl full of arabi, tomato, green pepper and about four teaspoonfuls of beans. Two teaspoonfuls of apple salad. Having requested just four rotis without ghee didn’t have any effects on the kitchen.
2. Need to compare it with Sallekhana diet: it was one roti with two teaspoonful of curry: it meant 600 rice grains.
3. This plate had 2400 ( 2700 ) rice grains worth of rotis ( though I still consider ghee to be complementary as I had requested to not add it ). Vegetables bowl with arabi is equivalent to at least 30 teaspoonful of rice grains: 3000 rice grains. Bean curry is worth 600 rice grains. Apple salad, two teaspoonful is at least 200 rice grains ( that’s an understatement not litotes or meiosis because apple is costlier compared to rice. )
4. Total: 6500 rice grains worth of lunch. It was posh-No. It was a middle class lunch: it wasn’t posh. It was a lunch I used to have a few months ago. Middle class people here consider themselves kings and queens. That’s where the delusional term posh is born from. Upper middle class people start considering themselves to be sole nutrition givers, as if entire world economy revolves around them. Even in terms of pure rice grains worth it was 10.33 times costlier compared to Sallekhana diet.
Cost comparison:
1. Apple: about 90 rupees per Kilogram it’s 2.25 times costlier compared to rice grains so one on one comparison used here isn’t justified though I have no other way to convert these else I won’t be able to manage on a regular basis in the given rubric.
2. Comparing ghee with apple: ghee wins as the costliest item in your plate. Giving up ghee altogether might save your pocket and do a good, a lasting good to your health and happiness if you can convince the kitchen for it.
3. Ghee is 6.88 or 7 times costlier compared to even apple: the second highest in terms of cost.
4. Wheat is 25 rupees per Kilogram which means it’s one item worth less than rice grains which are 40 rupees per kilogram.
5. On an average, 30 grams of wheat flour or atta is needed to prepare one roti.
6. One teaspoonful of heaped sugar is 7.5 grams of sugar. Normal teaspoonful is 4 grams.
7. Let’s take heaped teaspoonfuls as rubric to measure rice grains and wheat grains.
8. Six rotis are worth 180 grams of wheat which is, at the rate of 40 grams per rupee, less than a rupee per roti. Adding cooking cost, LPG ( Liquid Petroleum Gas) cost and serving, some hotels here sell twenty rupees per four pieces or four rupees per roti. Which means 25 rupees for six rotis. Which means 9375 rice grains at the rate of 375 rice grains per rupee. This won’t be a good conversion.
9. Equivalent conversion which is sustainable is 180 grams of wheat or 2700 rice grains. Here, we haven’t added cooking cost similar to ghee cost. We can update the total rice grains amount today into conversion and arrive at 6500 rice grains. If we added ghee cost it would have been 12-15 times costlier compared to Sallekhana diet. Sallekhana diet was just a few days ago: one roti without ghee and two teaspoonful of curry or rice which was sometimes stale and sometimes fresh.

Posted on by dancinglightofgrace

How Does It Matter?

What is the legacy you want to leave behind?

  1. However, I would like to share my ideas about why legacies don’t matter from the first person’s viewpoint.
  2. Most of the people who imagine impact of legacies on their descendants or generations that follow believe that they’ll somehow be ( indirectly ) present to experience this impact. And it will cause them pleasure or pain via some invisible connection.
  3. They imagine that impact based on the model of glowing legacies of the worlds they inhabit, though they forget that the impacts of those legacies are not being experienced by those who left them behind.
  4. There’s no logical sense in longing for leaving a legacy or having an impact which is witnessed by some imaginary agents in an imaginary future.
  5. If I am a nobody now, let me be content with it; let there be a complete acceptance of the fact rather than longing for a legacy.
  6. Most of the people who believe in legacies are also the people who believe in either eternal recurrence or reincarnation.
  7. They’re also the people who think and talk like this:
  8. “Think about leaving a better Earth for future generations.”
  9. Why? Maybe because you would be asked by an entity in the afterlife about what you did or didn’t?
  10. It’s all make-believe.
Posted on by dancinglightofgrace · 2 Comments

Why Did I Give Up Writing?

What public figure do you disagree with the most?

Step 1: Imagine a public figure. Stats ( referal in public figure’s stats mostly from Automattic ) booming.

Step 2: Public figure has absolutely no original opinion: disregard.

Step 3: What or Which? Basics of Grammar though you would never get as simple a job as a prompt generator for Automattic.

Step 4: Look what their prompt did! Nothing.

Step 5: There were no public figures I disagreed with.

Step 6: Didn’t mean I agreed with public figures. There was nothing to agree or disagree with. Agreement or disagreement changed nothing in the machinery.

Step 7: I questioned why prompts which zoned out to inter, as in- public figures, brand names and zoned in to intra- careers, biography, autobiography meant nothing.

Posted on by dancinglightofgrace · 3 Comments

The Most Truthful Media Outlet and Logical Excellence of Going To Be Popular Elite Leader!

Do you vote in political elections?

  1. No.
  2. However: I wanted to create an archive of what I thought was absurd logic given via a reputed media outlet.
  3. This media outlet has taken complete shelter of one side despite claiming to be impartial.
  4. The usual stance had been to take side of the opposition rather than the ruling party which means they would oppose the very people they’ve been supporting if they become the ruling party.
  5. Reason: to support those in need. To find flaws in the democracy by being the fourth pillar of the democracy.
  6. By the fifth point most of the bots and casual skimmers have gone to sleep. You might need to return to this archive if it survives, if you survive, in a few days, weeks, months or years. Decades would be an exaggeration because literal decadence has set-in.
  7. Coming to the main point: “the popular leader declared their caste to be such to ingratiate masses. First: their academic records are fake. Doesn’t matter. Now their caste records are fake. Doesn’t matter. Does anything matter?”
  8. No. It’s besides the point because I am not a political commentator.
  9. Again coming to the main point: the not-so-popular-leader who might become very popular in nearby future as the person he’s weighing in his argument on a media outlet ( with many people clapping nearby), speaks: “The popular leader who had falsified his caste records to ingratiate downtrodden masses was discerned and judged by me to be from a general caste because I never saw him walking hand-in-hand with common people. Never saw him hugging people from downtrodden classes of society.”
  10. That logic, stated in the point number nine was to establish how this leader was identified to exhibit lack of genuine empathy for a certain group of people.
  11. Wait a minute: it establishes that the accusing person must have genuine empathy for all people. They must have transcended limitations of caste and creed. No, it doesn’t. The argument is petty.
  12. You don’t need to belong to any caste to have genuine empathy. It’s not a sound logic to say that a person born  in a general class, in an elite class or in a downtrodden class can’t have genuine empathy towards all beings because of their birth in those particular classes.
  13. The argument forgets that the person in question himself was born in an elite family. His hugging common people or walking hand-in-hand with downtrodden people would never be considered as genuine empathy unless it accompanies commensurate actions.
  14. “A wasn’t doing this eating, walking and hugging people. I identified him as not belonging to their class. Even research into his documents verified the same.”
  15. “Though I was born into an elite class, I exhibit genuine empathy by hugging ( holding hands of) people from all classes. Especially downtrodden masses.”
  16. If the logic is: a person can exhibit genuine empathy only towards the persons of their own caste: the logic establishes that the person born in elite class CAN’T really hug common people or walk with them even if he pretends to do that.
  17. If the person born in the elite class says that it’s possible to exhibit empathy towards common classes or downtrodden classes despite being born in a general class: there’s no need to use logic of ‘caste’.
  18. By 17 it only becomes a question of whether a person has empathy or not. It’s another matter to decide how to judge whether they have genuine empathy.
  19. It’s completely illogical to use caste as a standard to allege that a person was being more loyal to their own people. By the same logic elite group leader was always loyal to their own: elite group.
  20. General strategy is to pretend to belong to whatever gets things done. Same with the logic of masses being able to sway masses as if they’re blind. Pyramid’s Eye.
  21. Thus: both popular and going-to-be-popular-born-elite leaders keep entertaining masses. The only truthful media person takes shelter because they need to continue earning their living.
Posted on by dancinglightofgrace

No!

Do you have a quote you live your life by or think of often?

  1. No isn’t a quote.
  2. And I am not even trying to be dramatic.
  3. To attract attention of a few numbers which give thumbs up or comments which mean little more than deluge of spams similar to cannabis sellers.
  4. Or the ghosts of Starjade ( The much awaited Deuteronomy Prophet) mixed with Mephiboseth from dilapidated forums of Pam or Lib from two decades ago doing rounds on foreign language speaking alien lady’s weblog-lecturing on tenets of new religion which have longer comments trails than actual weblog posts because practically it’s better to waste your neighborhood’s comment trails by hijacking it despite blogging etiquettes suggesting otherwise than continuing to buy blogging space for your own prophesies.
  5. You only need quotes to convince others about how much of **** it has been and it somehow makes others accept how **** it’s and why it’s not going to be any different.
  6. All great prophets, saints and messiahs, leaders and led leave legacies which are woven to….mislead isn’t even a word….it’s so much off the mark…..I can’t even tell you how much off the mark it’s because there’s no mark.