How Does It Matter?

What is the legacy you want to leave behind?

  1. However, I would like to share my ideas about why legacies don’t matter from the first person’s viewpoint.
  2. Most of the people who imagine impact of legacies on their descendants or generations that follow believe that they’ll somehow be ( indirectly ) present to experience this impact. And it will cause them pleasure or pain via some invisible connection.
  3. They imagine that impact based on the model of glowing legacies of the worlds they inhabit, though they forget that the impacts of those legacies are not being experienced by those who left them behind.
  4. There’s no logical sense in longing for leaving a legacy or having an impact which is witnessed by some imaginary agents in an imaginary future.
  5. If I am a nobody now, let me be content with it; let there be a complete acceptance of the fact rather than longing for a legacy.
  6. Most of the people who believe in legacies are also the people who believe in either eternal recurrence or reincarnation.
  7. They’re also the people who think and talk like this:
  8. “Think about leaving a better Earth for future generations.”
  9. Why? Maybe because you would be asked by an entity in the afterlife about what you did or didn’t?
  10. It’s all make-believe.

Why Did I Give Up Writing?

What public figure do you disagree with the most?

Step 1: Imagine a public figure. Stats ( referal in public figure’s stats mostly from Automattic ) booming.

Step 2: Public figure has absolutely no original opinion: disregard.

Step 3: What or Which? Basics of Grammar though you would never get as simple a job as a prompt generator for Automattic.

Step 4: Look what their prompt did! Nothing.

Step 5: There were no public figures I disagreed with.

Step 6: Didn’t mean I agreed with public figures. There was nothing to agree or disagree with. Agreement or disagreement changed nothing in the machinery.

Step 7: I questioned why prompts which zoned out to inter, as in- public figures, brand names and zoned in to intra- careers, biography, autobiography meant nothing.

The Most Truthful Media Outlet and Logical Excellence of Going To Be Popular Elite Leader!

Do you vote in political elections?

  1. No.
  2. However: I wanted to create an archive of what I thought was absurd logic given via a reputed media outlet.
  3. This media outlet has taken complete shelter of one side despite claiming to be impartial.
  4. The usual stance had been to take side of the opposition rather than the ruling party which means they would oppose the very people they’ve been supporting if they become the ruling party.
  5. Reason: to support those in need. To find flaws in the democracy by being the fourth pillar of the democracy.
  6. By the fifth point most of the bots and casual skimmers have gone to sleep. You might need to return to this archive if it survives, if you survive, in a few days, weeks, months or years. Decades would be an exaggeration because literal decadence has set-in.
  7. Coming to the main point: “the popular leader declared their caste to be such to ingratiate masses. First: their academic records are fake. Doesn’t matter. Now their caste records are fake. Doesn’t matter. Does anything matter?”
  8. No. It’s besides the point because I am not a political commentator.
  9. Again coming to the main point: the not-so-popular-leader who might become very popular in nearby future as the person he’s weighing in his argument on a media outlet ( with many people clapping nearby), speaks: “The popular leader who had falsified his caste records to ingratiate downtrodden masses was discerned and judged by me to be from a general caste because I never saw him walking hand-in-hand with common people. Never saw him hugging people from downtrodden classes of society.”
  10. That logic, stated in the point number nine was to establish how this leader was identified to exhibit lack of genuine empathy for a certain group of people.
  11. Wait a minute: it establishes that the accusing person must have genuine empathy for all people. They must have transcended limitations of caste and creed. No, it doesn’t. The argument is petty.
  12. You don’t need to belong to any caste to have genuine empathy. It’s not a sound logic to say that a person born  in a general class, in an elite class or in a downtrodden class can’t have genuine empathy towards all beings because of their birth in those particular classes.
  13. The argument forgets that the person in question himself was born in an elite family. His hugging common people or walking hand-in-hand with downtrodden people would never be considered as genuine empathy unless it accompanies commensurate actions.
  14. “A wasn’t doing this eating, walking and hugging people. I identified him as not belonging to their class. Even research into his documents verified the same.”
  15. “Though I was born into an elite class, I exhibit genuine empathy by hugging ( holding hands of) people from all classes. Especially downtrodden masses.”
  16. If the logic is: a person can exhibit genuine empathy only towards the persons of their own caste: the logic establishes that the person born in elite class CAN’T really hug common people or walk with them even if he pretends to do that.
  17. If the person born in the elite class says that it’s possible to exhibit empathy towards common classes or downtrodden classes despite being born in a general class: there’s no need to use logic of ‘caste’.
  18. By 17 it only becomes a question of whether a person has empathy or not. It’s another matter to decide how to judge whether they have genuine empathy.
  19. It’s completely illogical to use caste as a standard to allege that a person was being more loyal to their own people. By the same logic elite group leader was always loyal to their own: elite group.
  20. General strategy is to pretend to belong to whatever gets things done. Same with the logic of masses being able to sway masses as if they’re blind. Pyramid’s Eye.
  21. Thus: both popular and going-to-be-popular-born-elite leaders keep entertaining masses. The only truthful media person takes shelter because they need to continue earning their living.

Directions?

What gives you direction in life?

  1. The question presupposes that life is a journey.
  2. The question presupposes that there’s a beginning, an end and directions.
  3. The question presupposes that there’s a clear goal.
  4. Time: after hearing the news of demise of people, when there’s no possibility of seeing them, hearing from them or meeting them in the real time, you estimate their worth. In those moral estimates which are temporal, variegated and dependent on viewpoints you imagine directions as if life was a karmic vector.
  5. Is life really a karmic vector or a mission? Maybe it’s for some people. Then there is weighing of temporal events on a karmic scale.
  6. Is life a scalar, static, immovable quantity? I don’t know.
  7. What’s life if it’s not merely a journey?
  8. Are people, places, things, views and experiences happening in me or am I happening in them?
  9. Does direction indicate a sense of seeing or visual perception primarily or all senses contribute into having moved?
  10. What does it mean to have experience other than a bundle of memories, most of which are being thrown out of your system faster than you hold onto them consciously?
  11. Where am I heading to?

No!

Do you have a quote you live your life by or think of often?

  1. No isn’t a quote.
  2. And I am not even trying to be dramatic.
  3. To attract attention of a few numbers which give thumbs up or comments which mean little more than deluge of spams similar to cannabis sellers.
  4. Or the ghosts of Starjade ( The much awaited Deuteronomy Prophet) mixed with Mephiboseth from dilapidated forums of Pam or Lib from two decades ago doing rounds on foreign language speaking alien lady’s weblog-lecturing on tenets of new religion which have longer comments trails than actual weblog posts because practically it’s better to waste your neighborhood’s comment trails by hijacking it despite blogging etiquettes suggesting otherwise than continuing to buy blogging space for your own prophesies.
  5. You only need quotes to convince others about how much of **** it has been and it somehow makes others accept how **** it’s and why it’s not going to be any different.
  6. All great prophets, saints and messiahs, leaders and led leave legacies which are woven to….mislead isn’t even a word….it’s so much off the mark…..I can’t even tell you how much off the mark it’s because there’s no mark.

Why Would I?

What are your favorite emojis?

  1. It’s similar to asking: “Do you have any favorite words?”
  2. Or “Do you have any favorite language?”
  3. No, I don’t.
  4. Words and languages are merely tools to accomplish a need. The need is communication.
  5. Emoticons, similarly, accomplish this need.

Tell Us And We Will Ensure You Can’t

How do you unwind after a demanding day?

  1. Heart of cynicism.
  2. There’s a bike. There’s no bike.
  3. There’s a job. There’s no job.
  4. There’s another job. No job.
  5. There’s another investment plan. There’s no investment plan.
  6. There’s another story. It’s a tragic tale of hopelessness.
  7. There are more hungry people.
  8. There are more hungry people.
  9. There are more hungry people without reason.
  10. This was always tragic. No change.
  11. Good night.

WordPress

How do you use social media?

  1. I used e-mail.
  2. Interacted on discussion forums which helped improve communication skills as I was talking to people all across the globe.
  3. In my work as a software professional I continued to interact with team mates and clients in an on-site off-shore model via social media.
  4. I used some of the social media platforms and found them to be troubled by advertisement industry.
  5. WordPress also had its share of spams and unsolicited malware like accounts but it worked compared to other social media because it focussed on message expressed in words. What happened to Twitter is apparent. Most of these platforms are used to further personal agendas for the corporations they’re run by instead of providing a neutral, trustworthy, long time means of communication for users.