This passage is often cited as one of the most beautiful examples of “scientific poetry” in the English language. Bloom’s meditation on water moves from the astronomical to the microscopic, celebrating water as the ultimate “paradigm and paragon.”
Etymology: Epps vs. Epping
It is important to clarify that Epps’s Cocoa (the drink Bloom prepares) and the name Epping (as in Epping Forest) come from different roots.
* Epps (The Cocoa): This is a patronymic surname. It comes from the name Epp, which is a medieval short form of Egbert (Old English Ecgberht, meaning “bright edge” or “bright sword”). In the 19th century, James Epps & Co. was a famous homeopathic chemist that popularized “prepared cocoa.”
* Epping: This is a place name with Old English roots. It likely comes from Ypping, meaning “the people of the upland” or “the people of the lookout point” (yppe meaning a raised floor or platform).
Etymology: Ithaca
The title of this chapter, Ithaca, comes from the Greek Itháke (Ἰθάκη).
* Root Theories: Some linguists suggest it comes from the Phoenician word Utica (meaning “ancient”). Others point to the Greek word ithys (ἰθύς), meaning “straight,” or ithar (ἰθάρ), meaning “cheerful” or “clear.”
* Symbolism: In the context of the Odyssey, Ithaca is the rugged island home of Odysseus. For Bloom, 7 Eccles Street is his Ithaca—the destination of his long day’s journey. By titling this clinical, data-heavy chapter “Ithaca,” Joyce suggests that “home” is not just a feeling, but a collection of objective facts, memories, and physical properties.
This passage is the famous “Litanies of Water.” Having spent the day wandering through a city of drought and thirst, Bloom finally taps into the source. True to the “Ithaca” style, Joyce doesn’t just describe water coming out of a tap; he describes the entire municipal engineering feat that brings it from the Wicklow mountains to 7 Eccles Street.
The mention of Mr. Spencer Harty and Mr. Ignatius Rice anchors the fiction in the real historical administration of 1904 Dublin. Bloom’s admiration for the water is not just aesthetic—it is the respect of a “watercarrier” for a life-giving utility that is currently under threat by a “prolonged summer drouth.”
The Qualities of Water
To answer the final question in your text (“What in water did Bloom… admire?”), Joyce launches into one of the most lyrical lists in modern literature. Bloom admires:
* Its universality: its democratic nature.
* Its vastness: in the oceans and the icecaps.
* Its power: in hydro-electric plants and tides.
* Its fluidity: always seeking its own level.
* Its purity: its capacity to cleanse and dissolve.
That is a very sharp observation. The “old-man-faced” children in the image actually align perfectly with medieval and early Renaissance artistic traditions, which Joyce (and Stephen Dedalus) would have been intimately familiar with.
The “Homunculus” Concept
For centuries, children in religious art were depicted as “Homunculi” (Latin for “little men”). This wasn’t because artists forgot what babies looked like, but because of a theological belief called Preformationism.
* Theological Reason: It was believed that Jesus was born “perfect” and “unchanging.” Therefore, to show his divinity, artists painted him as a miniature, fully-formed adult rather than a helpless infant.
* Stephen’s Perspective: Stephen is obsessed with church history and the “Apostolic succession.” He sees the world through a lens of antiquity. To him, an image of an “innocent” wouldn’t just be a cute baby; it would be a symbolic figure representing the weight of history and the “soul” of the child.
Why Joyce Included This
By describing the infants in “attitudes of crucifixion,” Joyce is highlighting that these children are born into a cycle of suffering. They aren’t just babies; they are symbols of the innocence already marked for sacrifice. Their “elderly” appearance in the art emphasizes that they carry the burden of the past before they can even speak their “vocalic and consonantal exercises.”
The “crucifixion” images were physically there, but they weren’t literal crucifixes. Stephen is looking at a religious instructional poster—specifically a “Sacred Heart” or “Holy Family” chart often found in Catholic homes—that included a depiction of the Slaughter of the Innocents.
In the flickering firelight, the “belted infants” in the illustration appear to Stephen’s weary, poetic mind as being in “attitudes of crucifixion.”
The Purpose of the Image
Joyce uses this specific image to serve three major thematic purposes:
* The Father-Son Bond: The “Slaughter of the Innocents” represents the ultimate failure of fathers to protect their sons. Throughout Ulysses, Bloom is a father looking for a son (Rudy, who died), and Stephen is a son looking for a spiritual father.
* Instruction vs. Suffering: The chart combines the ABC’s (vocalic and consonantal exercises) with religious martyrdom. It suggests that in Ireland, learning to speak and learning to suffer go hand-in-hand.
* Martyrdom of the Artist: Stephen often views himself as a martyr to Irish society. Seeing “innocents” in a state of crucifixion mirrors his own feeling of being sacrificed by the “church and state.”
In this sequence, the cold, clinical “catechism” style of Ithaca reaches a peak of domestic science. Bloom’s simple act of lighting a fire is described as a chemical reaction—the “free union” of carbon and hydrogen with oxygen—while the cost of the coal is recorded with the precision of an invoice.
The contrast here is beautiful: Bloom is focused on potential energy and mechanics, while Stephen is lost in memory. As Stephen watches Bloom kneel, he sees a ghostly procession of all the people who have ever tended a fire for him—his mother, his father, and the priests of his youth. It transforms Bloom’s kitchen into a sacred space of hospitality and shared history.
The Vision on the Wall
To answer the final question in your text (“What did Stephen see on raising his gaze… towards the opposite wall?”):
Stephen saw a duplicated, reproduced scheme—a functional, instructional advertisement or chart. Specifically, he saw:
> “The slaughter of the innocents, a row of belted infants in various attitudes of crucifixion, and, beneath, a cumulative sequence of vocalic and consonantal exercises.”
>
This refers to a printed instructional sheet for children, likely belonging to Bloom’s daughter Milly when she was young. It represents the intersection of the domestic (learning to speak) and the religious (the biblical “slaughter of the innocents”), fitting perfectly into Stephen’s preoccupation with fathers, sons, and the cycle of life.
Would you like me to generate an image of Bloom and Stephen sitting by this newly kindled fire, or shall we move on to the famous “Water” section where Bloom fills the kettle?
This section is a triumph of Joyce’s “Ithaca” style—the “keyless couple” standing before the door of 7 Eccles Street. Bloom’s physical maneuvers are described with the precision of a blueprint, and his frustration is one we can all relate to: the meta-annoyance of remembering that you told yourself not to forget.
The description of Bloom’s leap into the “area” (the sunken courtyard in front of a Dublin townhouse) is treated like a formal experiment in physics. Rather than saying “he jumped,” Joyce provides Bloom’s exact weight (11 stone 4 pounds), the date he last weighed himself at the chemist’s, and even the liturgical and astronomical cycles of the year 1904. It turns a simple act of breaking into one’s own house into a cosmic event.
The Discrete Succession of Images
To address the final question in your text (“What discrete succession of images did Stephen meanwhile perceive?”), the narrative shifts to Stephen’s perspective as he watches Bloom from above. He sees:
* A black figure (Bloom) appearing in the “area” below.
* The flare of a match in the darkness of the kitchen.
* The slow growth of light as Bloom navigates the scullery.
* Finally, the reappearance of Bloom at the front door, opening it from the inside to let his guest in.
Would you like me to generate an image of Bloom’s “stratagem” at the railings, or shall we continue with the “water” section, where Bloom fills the kettle for their cocoa?
In the dense, clinical world of “Ithaca,” this phrase is Stephen Dedalus’s poetic way of describing a bad omen. To break down the “Joyce-speak”:
* Reapparition: A reappearance.
* Matutinal: Occurring in the morning (from the Latin matutinus).
* Cloud: A literal cloud, but here, it’s a symbolic shadow.
The Meaning
Stephen is referring back to the very beginning of the novel (the “Telemachus” episode). Early that morning, while standing on top of the Martello tower, both he and Bloom (from different parts of Dublin) observed a cloud covering the sun, turning the day gloomy.
For Stephen, that cloud represented his guilt and depression regarding his mother’s death. When he “collapses” later in the night, Bloom tries to find a scientific reason (hunger or cheap wine), but Stephen insists it was the return of that morning’s “dark cloud” over his spirit.
The Literary Connection
Joyce is also making a biblical allusion to 1 Kings 18:44, where a servant sees “a little cloud out of the sea, like a man’s hand,” which signals the end of a drought. However, for Stephen, the cloud signals a “drought” of the soul.
The contrast between Bloom’s materialism and Stephen’s spiritualism is never sharper than in their explanations for Stephen’s fainting spell earlier that night. Bloom, the amateur scientist, blames “gastric inanition” (an empty stomach) and bad alcohol; Stephen, the poet, blames the “reapparition of a matutinal cloud.” One sees a biological malfunction; the other sees a metaphysical omen.
The list of Bloom’s past companions highlights his deep-seated loneliness. He looks back at a sequence of years—1884 to 1904—realizing a bittersweet mathematical truth: as a person grows older and gains more individual experience, the number of deep, “interindividual” connections with others tends to shrink. He is a man with a vast internal world but a diminishing social one.
The Mathematical Progression
To answer the prompt’s final question (“As in what ways?”), Joyce proceeds to provide a clinical breakdown of their age difference. It is one of the most famous passages in the chapter, using “geometric progression” to show that while Bloom is currently much older than Stephen, the ratio of their ages is constantly changing, though they will never meet.
> “He [Bloom] lived at the period of the birth of the father of Stephen… and he would be 83 when Stephen was 54.”
>
Would you like me to provide the full text of this mathematical age comparison, or shall we move to the moment they finally arrive at the door of 7 Eccles Street and realize Bloom has forgotten his key?
In “Ithaca,” the prose transitions from the “tired” clichés of the previous chapter into a cold, clinical catechism. Joyce uses this “mathematical” style to strip the characters down to their objective facts, even as they discuss deeply human topics like music and “heterosexual magnetism.”
The detail regarding the “chord in any circle being less than the arc which it subtends” is a perfect example of how Joyce replaces emotional descriptions with geometric certainty. It treats their walk not as a midnight stroll, but as a physical trajectory through space.
Divergent Views and the “Ithaca” Perspective
To answer the final question in your excerpt: Yes, their views were significantly divergent. While they shared a “tenacity of heterodox resistance” (a fancy way of saying they were both rebellious thinkers), they differed on the application of logic versus spirit. Bloom, the scientific mind, viewed the world through the lens of practical utility and social reform. Stephen, the artistic mind, viewed it through the lens of aesthetics and metaphysics.
Bloom sees a tree and thinks of the effect of gaslight on its growth; Stephen sees a tree and thinks of its symbolic place in a poem or a theological argument.
Would you like to explore the specific “mathematical” breakdown of their ages that follows, or continue with their arrival at the locked door of 7 Eccles Street?
We have now transitioned from the exhausted, rambling prose of “Eumaeus” into the cold, clinical, and scientific “Ithaca” episode. This is often considered the “mathematical” chapter of Ulysses, written in a catechism-like format of questions and answers. It strips away the emotional fog of the previous chapter and replaces it with raw data, physics, and cosmic scale.
Here is the opening of the penultimate chapter:
Chapter 17: Ithaca
What parallel courses did Bloom and Stephen follow returning?
Starting unitedly from the food of Gardiner Street lower they walked together standingly along the northern section of the Leopold Bloom and Stephen Dedalus (the former being about 5′ 9½” in height, the latter 6′ 0″) along the former’s route from the shelter toward his residence, 7 Eccles Street.
What objects did they encounter?
A horse-drawn sweeper, a street-lamp, a sentry-box, a brazier of burning coke, and various shadows.
Were they both equally conscious of the environment?
No. Stephen, being in a state of intellectual and physical fatigue, was less aware of the topographical details, whereas Bloom, ever the observer, noted the specificities of the path, including the municipal improvements and the lack of proper lighting in certain sectors.
The tone has shifted dramatically—we are now looking at these two men as if through a microscope or from a great celestial distance.
Would you like to continue with the specific “scientific” questions regarding their conversation on the way to 7 Eccles Street?
The “Eumaeus” episode draws to a close with a characteristic mix of high-minded aspiration and earthy reality. Bloom is lost in a managerial daydream—acting as the ultimate “backer-up”—imagining Stephen as a social and financial success. He sees Stephen’s tenor voice not just as art, but as a “capital opening” that could win him a “stiff figure” and an entrée into the homes of financial magnates.
True to the “tired” style of the chapter, Bloom’s internal monologue is a tangle of clichés (“fools step in where angels,” “filthy lucre,” “ball at his feet”). Yet, the passage is grounded by the stark, physical presence of the horse. The “three smoking globes of turds” falling to the pavement serve as a literal and metaphorical punctuation mark to Bloom’s lofty social climbing.
As they walk toward the railway bridge—one “full” (Bloom), one “lean” (Stephen)—the driver of the sweeper car watches them, a silent witness to this odd, nocturnal union.
> Summary: You have generated 11.65 pages (standard 250 words/page) today.
>
Would you like to continue into the final episodes of the novel, or shall we pause to look at the “Father Maher” reference in that final paragraph?
As the “ship of the street” (the street-sweeper) passes, we see Bloom’s mind doing what it does best: humanizing everything in its path. His pity for the “big nervous foolish noodly” horse—and his genuine regret at not having a lump of sugar—contrasts beautifully with the intellectual distance of Stephen, who is busy quoting 16th-century Dutch composers like Sweelinck.
The moment Bloom mentions his wife, Molly, “plunging in medias res,” the stakes of the invitation change. He is no longer just a Good Samaritan; he is a talent scout and a husband, dreaming of a “new vista” where Stephen’s voice and Molly’s musicality create a bridge to a more aristocratic, refined life. The irony, of course, is that while Stephen sings of “sirens, sweet murderers of men,” Bloom is leading him home to a woman who is her own kind of siren—though perhaps more life-giving than murderous.
>
This marks a pivotal moment in Ulysses—the literal and symbolic “arm-in-arm” departure of Stephen and Bloom from the shelter.
Bloom’s practical nature shines through here as he settles the bill (the “last of the Mohicans” or his final four pennies) and answers Stephen’s philosophical-adjacent question about upside-down chairs with the most mundane, logical answer possible: “To sweep the floor in the morning.” This interaction perfectly encapsulates their dynamic: Stephen, the intellectual searching for “original” meaning in the trivial, and Bloom, the grounded father figure offering physical support to a young man “weak on his pins.”
The mention of the “split” and the “stoning to death” refers to the political downfall of Charles Stewart Parnell, a ghost that haunts the entire novel. Bloom’s internal monologue once again bridges the gap between his personal act of kindness and the larger, often cruel, history of Ireland.
>
We’ve moved into the visionary portion of the “Eumaeus” episode. Bloom’s “busy brain” is spinning a classic middle-aged fantasy: he’s not just looking for a friend; he’s looking for a protégé.
The “Utopian plans” Bloom builds for Stephen—concert tours, “duets in Italian,” and “up to date billing”—reveal his desire to manage Stephen’s talent. It’s a touching, if slightly delusional, attempt to bridge the gap between his own mundane life and Stephen’s artistic potential. Meanwhile, the atmospheric shift to the “ancient mariner” with his “greenish goggles” adds that surreal, nautical layer Joyce loved to weave through the Dublin streets.
The transition from Bloom’s internal grandiosity to the mundane reading of the newspaper (“The cabby read out…”) provides that signature Joycean bathos—dropping from the heights of “Utopian plans” to the boring news of a cabdrivers’ dinner.
Dancing light of grace 